=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20211023: found digest-20211023
WARNING: [license.mk] Every package should define a LICENSE.
=> Checksum BLAKE2s OK for bulk_mailer-1.13.tar.gz
=> Checksum SHA512 OK for bulk_mailer-1.13.tar.gz
===> Installing dependencies for bulk_mailer-1.13nb1
=> Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.12
=> Build dependency cwrappers>=20150314: found cwrappers-20180325
===> Skipping vulnerability checks.
WARNING: No /usr/pkg/pkgdb/pkg-vulnerabilities file found.
WARNING: To fix run: `/usr/sbin/pkg_admin -K /usr/pkg/pkgdb fetch-pkg-vulnerabilities'.
===> Overriding tools for bulk_mailer-1.13nb1
===> Extracting for bulk_mailer-1.13nb1
===> Patching for bulk_mailer-1.13nb1
=> Applying pkgsrc patches for bulk_mailer-1.13nb1
=> Verifying /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/mail/bulk_mailer/patches/patch-aa
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/mail/bulk_mailer/patches/patch-aa
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.2 2007/04/24 22:31:19 abs Exp $
|
|--- bulk_mailer.c.orig	2000-05-24 19:34:33.000000000 +0000
|+++ bulk_mailer.c	2007-04-12 13:08:43.000000000 +0000
--------------------------
Patching file bulk_mailer.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 101.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 291.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 308.
done
=> Verifying /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/mail/bulk_mailer/patches/patch-ab
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/mail/bulk_mailer/patches/patch-ab
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ab,v 1.1 2007/04/24 22:31:19 abs Exp $
|
|--- configure.in.orig	1998-01-21 15:41:47.000000000 +0000
|+++ configure.in	2007-04-12 13:04:55.000000000 +0000
--------------------------
Patching file configure.in using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 15.
done
=> Verifying /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/mail/bulk_mailer/patches/patch-ac
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/mail/bulk_mailer/patches/patch-ac
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ac,v 1.1 2007/04/24 22:31:20 abs Exp $
|
|--- configure.orig	1998-01-21 15:41:57.000000000 +0000
|+++ configure	2007-04-12 13:05:00.000000000 +0000
--------------------------
Patching file configure using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 690.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 809.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 893.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 929.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 949.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 960.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1017.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 3201.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 3222.
done
===> Creating toolchain wrappers for bulk_mailer-1.13nb1
===> Configuring for bulk_mailer-1.13nb1
=> Checking for portability problems in extracted files
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for gethostbyname in -lnsl... no
checking for socket in -lsocket... no
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /tmp/mail/bulk_mailer/work/.tools/bin/grep
checking for egrep... /tmp/mail/bulk_mailer/work/.tools/bin/grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for string.h... (cached) yes
checking whether struct tm is in sys/time.h or time.h... time.h
checking for gethostname... yes
checking for strdup... yes
checking for strndup... yes
checking for strerror... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile