=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20190127 => Checksum SHA1 OK for numpy-1.19.2.zip => Checksum RMD160 OK for numpy-1.19.2.zip => Checksum SHA512 OK for numpy-1.19.2.zip ===> Installing dependencies for py36-numpy-1.19.2nb1 ========================================================================== The following variables will affect the build process of this package, py36-numpy-1.19.2nb1. Their current value is shown below: * PKGSRC_BLAS_TYPES = netlib openblas openblas_pthread openblas_openmp * PYTHON_VERSION_DEFAULT = 37 Based on these variables, the following variables have been set: * BLAS_LIBS = -lblas * BLAS_TYPE = netlib * LAPACK_LIBS = -llapack -lblas * PYPACKAGE = python36 You may want to abort the process now with CTRL-C and change their value before continuing. Be sure to run `/usr/bin/make clean' after the changes. ========================================================================== => Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.12 => Build dependency cwrappers>=20150314: found cwrappers-20180325 => Full dependency py36-setuptools-[0-9]*: found py36-setuptools-50.3.0 => Full dependency gcc7>=7.0: found gcc7-7.5.0nb3 => Full dependency py36-cython>=0.29.21: found py36-cython-0.29.21 => Full dependency python36>=3.6.0: found python36-3.6.12nb1 => Full dependency lapack>=3.9.0nb1: found lapack-3.9.0nb1 ===> Skipping vulnerability checks. WARNING: No /var/db/pkg/pkg-vulnerabilities file found. WARNING: To fix run: `/usr/sbin/pkg_admin -K /var/db/pkg fetch-pkg-vulnerabilities'. ===> Overriding tools for py36-numpy-1.19.2nb1 ===> Extracting for py36-numpy-1.19.2nb1 ===> Patching for py36-numpy-1.19.2nb1 => Applying pkgsrc patches for py36-numpy-1.19.2nb1 => Verifying /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_____init____.py => Applying pkgsrc patch /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_____init____.py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_____init____.py,v 1.1 2019/02/01 09:24:25 adam Exp $ | |Recognize g95. | |--- numpy/distutils/fcompiler/__init__.py.orig 2013-04-07 05:04:05.000000000 +0000 |+++ numpy/distutils/fcompiler/__init__.py -------------------------- Patching file numpy/distutils/fcompiler/__init__.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 752 (offset -4 lines). done => Verifying /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_g95.py => Applying pkgsrc patch /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_g95.py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_g95.py,v 1.3 2015/04/17 00:41:38 wen Exp $ | |Band aid to make sure that pic_flags is actually used. | |--- numpy/distutils/fcompiler/g95.py.orig 2014-10-26 14:36:14.000000000 +0000 |+++ numpy/distutils/fcompiler/g95.py -------------------------- Patching file numpy/distutils/fcompiler/g95.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 17 (offset -2 lines). done => Verifying /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_gnu.py => Applying pkgsrc patch /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_gnu.py Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-numpy_distutils_fcompiler_gnu.py,v 1.17 2020/08/05 14:05:46 adam Exp $ | |Linker needs -shared explictly (at least with GCC 4.7 on SunOS), plus |any ABI flags as appropriate. |Do not generate debug symbols (remove '-g'). |On Darwin, do not use '-bundle' (to avoid Python.framework). |Do not use -funroll-loops compiler flag. |Do not run a shell command when it is "None". | |--- numpy/distutils/fcompiler/gnu.py.orig 2020-07-10 04:52:40.000000000 +0000 |+++ numpy/distutils/fcompiler/gnu.py -------------------------- Patching file numpy/distutils/fcompiler/gnu.py using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 60. Hunk #2 succeeded at 90. Hunk #3 succeeded at 136. Hunk #4 succeeded at 235. Hunk #5 succeeded at 297. Hunk #6 succeeded at 322. done => Verifying /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_system__info.py ************************************** Ignoring patch file /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_system__info.py: invalid checksum ************************************** => Verifying /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_linalg_lapack__litemodule.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_linalg_lapack__litemodule.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-numpy_linalg_lapack__litemodule.c,v 1.2 2020/04/27 17:00:35 adam Exp $ | |Add function definition for FNAME(MAIN_). | |--- numpy/linalg/lapack_litemodule.c.orig 2020-04-19 08:51:58.000000000 +0000 |+++ numpy/linalg/lapack_litemodule.c -------------------------- Patching file numpy/linalg/lapack_litemodule.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 37. done ERROR: Patching failed due to modified or broken patch file(s): ERROR: /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy/patches/patch-numpy_distutils_system__info.py *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /amd/pkgsrc/CHROOT/P/pkgsrc/math/py-numpy